Thank you for agreeing to review this article. Peer review in all its forms plays an important role in ensuring the integrity of the scholarly record. The process depends to a large extent on trust and requires that all involved behave responsibly and ethically. Please note that reviewers are required to use the online submission system and the reviews template available on the Guidelines for Reviewers page: https://ta.pubpub.org/pub/reviewers. The template in MSWord format can also be directly downloaded here: https://assets.pubpub.org/ls7xlzbr/61679494997989.docx. Any queries should be directed to the Editorial Organism at editors@technoeticartsjournal.org.

Drawing from academic research and often unorthodox approaches, Technoetic Arts is a peer-reviewed journal that explores the juncture of art practice, technology and the human mind, opening up a forum for trans-disciplinary speculative research.

We are thankful for all reviewers who engage in providing constructive feedback to the authors. Even if the article is rejected, your comments may result in greatly improved resubmissions, or new submissions, to this journal or other journals at a later date. We thank you in advance for your assistance. The peer-review system is critical to the quality of academic journals.

The Technoetic Arts Editorial Organism supports the proper recognition of all our reviewers. You will receive a ‘thank you for your review’ email from the system that you can forward to the Web of Science Reviewer Recognition Service (formerly publons.com) or similar services. Please contact us at editors@technoeticartsjournal.org for any further clarifications or support.

In step three of the review process in the online journal system, you will be asked to enter your review into a text field. You may copy-paste all of the sections below. In addition, it would be helpful if you could upload the file in the upload section.