Instructions for reviewers

JEM is an interdisciplinary journal that aims to publish methodologically plural and engaged scholarship. We rely on our reviewers to assess articles from their particular scholarly vantage point, mindful of the wide range of audiences the article may seek to engage.

We thank you for taking on this role and providing your critical expertise on this article for the Journal of Environmental Media. We ask that you refrain from using track changes on the article itself, and instead provide written comments below. Your contribution is invaluable to our peer review system and critical to the quality of the journal. The editors and authors are grateful for your time!

 

We suggest formatting your comments in a few paragraphs describing your general impressions of the article and specific points where you think revisions may be warranted. This should be followed by a clear recommendations for the editor of one of the following options:

Accept as is

Accept after minor revision

Major revisions

Reject

 

Individual line edits, if you have them, can be listed at the end.

 

Please note that the use of LLMs in conducting reviews is forbidden by the journal's editorial policies and likely constitutes a violation of the data privacy rights of the author.